Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))


Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(y, 0)
+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(s(x), +(y, 0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(y, 0)
+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(s(x), +(y, 0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(y, 0)
+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(s(x), +(y, 0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(s(x), +(y, 0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


+1(s(x), s(y)) → +1(s(x), +(y, 0))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
+1(x1, x2)  =  +1(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
+(x1, x2)  =  +(x1, x2)
0  =  0

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:
+^12 > +2
+^12 > 0
s1 > +2
s1 > 0

The following usable rules [14] were oriented:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ QDPOrderProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), 0) → s(x)
+(s(x), s(y)) → s(+(s(x), +(y, 0)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

+(0, x0)
+(s(x0), 0)
+(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.